<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>		<!-- generator="InstaScript v2.0" -->
		<rss version="2.0" 
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
		xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/"
		xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
		xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
		xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
		xmlns:amp="http://www.adobe.com/amp/1.0"
		xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
		xmlns:gm="http://www.google.com/schemas/gm/1.1">

		<channel>
		<title>Comments - Latest Popular Stories, Instablogs Community  by Will-g</title>
		<link>http://will-g.instablogs.com/</link>
		<description>Comments - Latest Popular Stories powered by Instablogs Community.</description>
		
		<language>en-us</language>
		<generator>Instascript 2.0 http://www.instablogs.com</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>
		Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:33:01 +0000			</lastBuildDate>
									<item>
							<title>Prince Campbell</title>
							<link>http://chartreuse.instablogs.com</link>
							<guid isPermaLink="true">http://chartreuse.instablogs.com</guid>
							<dc:creator>Prince Campbell</dc:creator>
							<description><![CDATA[This story in Slate is a complete fraud.<br/>
I think Nick Douglas of Gawker.com put it best.<br/>
<br/>
Why does Jimmy Wales believe that only 500 people wrote everything of import on Wikipedia? With 2 million articles on the site&#8217;s English version, that would mean each core user wrote nearly 20,000 articles in the seven years since the site launched. That&#8217;s eight articles a day per user, and clearly physically impossible. Is Wales unaware of this math, or is he so bent on maintaining Wikipedia&#8217;s respectability that he can&#8217;t admit how innovative it is?<br/>
<br/>
The real question is why we can&#8217;t vote Slate off the island?]]></description>
							<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>This story in Slate is a complete fraud.<br/><br />
I think Nick Douglas of Gawker.com put it best.<br/><br />
<br/><br />
Why does Jimmy Wales believe that only 500 people wrote everything of import on Wikipedia? With 2 million articles on the site&#8217;s English version, that would mean each core user wrote nearly 20,000 articles in the seven years since the site launched. That&#8217;s eight articles a day per user, and clearly physically impossible. Is Wales unaware of this math, or is he so bent on maintaining Wikipedia&#8217;s respectability that he can&#8217;t admit how innovative it is?<br/><br />
<br/><br />
The real question is why we can&#8217;t vote Slate off the island?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
							<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
						</item>
									</channel>
			</rss>
				